Understanding Maine’s EPS Formula—and Why It Hits Small Midcoast Towns Like Edgecomb Especially Hard

If you’ve ever looked at a Edgecomb’s school budget and wondered, “Why does our town pay so much when we have so few students?”—the answer often comes back to one thing: the Essential Programs and Services (EPS) formula.

While the EPS system was designed to create fairness across the state, its real-world impact can feel anything but equal—especially in small Midcoast communities like Edgecomb.

Let’s break it down in plain English.

What Is the EPS Formula?

Maine’s EPS formula is the state’s method for determining:

  1. How much it should cost to educate students in each district

  2. How much of that cost the state will pay

  3. How much local taxpayers are expected to cover

It was established to ensure every student in Maine has access to a baseline level of educational resources—regardless of where they live.

Step 1: Calculating the “Cost” of Education

The state estimates what it should cost to educate students based on several components:

  • Number of students (enrollment)

  • Grade levels (elementary vs. high school)

  • Staffing ratios (teachers, ed techs, specialists)

  • Transportation costs

  • Special education needs

  • Facilities and maintenance

This becomes your town’s EPS “Total Allocation”—essentially, a model-driven education budget.

Step 2: Determining Ability to Pay

Next, the state looks at each town’s fiscal capacity, which is based largely on:

  • Property valuations

  • ….Yeah that’s it for the moment

Towns with higher property values are considered more capable of funding their schools locally.

Step 3: Splitting the Bill

The state then divides responsibility based on how the budget that it calculated for EPS would affect the local Mille Rate establishing a cap:

  • The state pays a portion of the EPS calculated budget (state subsidy)

  • The town pays the rest of the EPS calculated budget (local share)

  • The town then decides if it needs to additionally fund education outside of the EPS calculation. Nearly every town in Maine does to some degree (additional local share).

In theory, this balances equity and local responsibility.

Why Small Midcoast Towns Feel the Strain

On paper, the EPS formula is logical. In practice, it creates real challenges for small towns—particularly in Midcoast Maine.

1. Small Enrollment = Limited Efficiency

In a town like Edgecomb, Maine, enrollment is relatively low. But schools still need:

  • A principal (a whole one, not a partial one)

  • Classroom teachers at each grade level

  • Support staff

  • A functioning building

You can’t easily “scale down” a school the way the EPS model assumes. A class of 10 students still needs a teacher—just like a class of 20.

Result: The actual cost per student is often higher than the EPS model predicts.

2. Property Values Skew the Formula

Midcoast towns often have:

  • Waterfront properties

  • Second homes

  • Seasonal residents

These factors inflate property valuations, which the EPS formula interprets as “ability to pay.”

But here’s the disconnect:

  • High property values ≠ high year-round income

  • Many full-time residents are on fixed or moderate incomes

Result: Towns are expected to fund a larger share locally, even if residents feel stretched.

3. Fixed Costs Don’t Shrink

EPS assumes certain efficiencies that small towns simply can’t achieve:

  • Combining grade levels has limits

  • Cutting staff quickly impacts educational quality

  • Buildings still require maintenance regardless of enrollment

Result: Even small budget increases can translate into large tax impacts.

4. Volatility Hits Harder

A handful of students moving in or out, especially those requiring specialized services, can significantly shift costs quickly in a small district.

Result: Budget swings are more dramatic and less predictable.

The Edgecomb Reality

All of these factors come into sharp focus in Edgecomb.

In the 2025 school year, Edgecomb received only about 11% of its total school budget from state subsidy.

That means:

  • Nearly 90% of the education budget was funded locally

  • Local taxpayers carry the overwhelming majority of costs

  • Even modest budget increases can have noticeable tax impacts

This is not because the town is overspending—it’s largely a result of how the EPS formula interprets:

  • Property wealth

  • School scale

  • Minimum staffing needs

A Key Misunderstanding: “Cost Per Student”

One common misconception is comparing cost per student between districts.

But this can be misleading.

  • Large districts benefit from economies of scale

  • Small towns like Edgecomb must maintain baseline services regardless of size

A more accurate way to think about it is marginal cost:

  • Adding one more student to an existing classroom costs very little

  • Removing a few students doesn’t eliminate the need for a teacher

Result: Small schools appear more expensive, but they’re often just less scalable.

Why This Matters for Local Decisions

Understanding EPS helps explain why:

  • School budgets may rise even when enrollment is flat or declining

  • Cuts don’t always produce proportional savings

  • Local taxes carry so much of the burden

It also highlights a critical reality:

For towns like Edgecomb, the funding challenge is structural—not simply a matter of spending choices.

Final Thought

Maine’s EPS formula was designed with fairness in mind—but fairness at the state level doesn’t always feel fair locally.

For small Midcoast towns, the combination of:

  • High property valuations

  • Small student populations

  • Fixed operational costs

creates a situation where communities like Edgecomb, Maine shoulder a disproportionately large share of education funding.

Understanding that context is essential for having a productive, fact-based conversation about school budgets—and about what it truly costs to provide a quality education in a small Maine town.

For communities like Edgecomb, Maine, the limitations of the current EPS formula are not something that can be solved locally—they are built into how the state calculates both need and ability to pay. Without changes at the state level, small Midcoast towns will continue to shoulder a disproportionate tax burden despite having limited flexibility to reduce costs without impacting students. That’s why it is so important for residents to engage beyond town meeting and make their voices heard with policymakers who have the authority to fix the system. Reaching out to your state legislators, county officials, and education leaders helps ensure that the real-world impacts on small communities are understood and considered. Meaningful reform will only happen if enough communities speak up collectively and advocate for a funding model that more accurately reflects the realities faced by towns like Edgecomb.

Previous
Previous

Why Special Education Matters — and Why It Costs So Much in Maine

Next
Next

In Defense of Edgecomb’s Tuition-In Students